Advertising Spending Over the Business Cycle

Value LeveragingDeleersnyder, B.; Dekimpe, M.G.; Steenkamp, J.E.M.; Leeflang, P.S.H. · 2009Journal of Marketing Research
Topicsadvertising spending·business cycle·national culture·co-movement elasticity·cross-country·private label·stock price

The economy turns down, the CFO asks every function to cut in proportion, and advertising becomes the easiest line to flex. Before approving that rule, decide whether marketing should amplify the cycle or preserve continuity through it. Greater economic-cycle sensitivity is associated with slower advertising-industry growth. Its links to faster private-label share growth and lower stock-price growth are less certain.

Set advertising budgets for the cycle, not from the cycle.

Across markets, advertising budgets usually rise and fall more sharply than economies do. Where advertising spending rises and falls more sharply with the economy, the advertising industry grows more slowly over the long run, private labels gain share faster, and advertisers' stock prices grow more slowly. CMOs should make advertising continuity an executive decision, calibrated by market and medium.

Data chart

Advertising usually follows and amplifies the economy

88Advertising moved with the economy62Advertising moved more sharply than theeconomy

Advertising spending usually moves with the economy and often moves more sharply.

Action guide

  1. Set the advertising continuity rule before downturn pressure arrives.Make continuity an executive policy: where advertising rises and falls more sharply with the economy, the industry grows more slowly, private labels gain share faster, and stock prices grow more slowly.
  2. Calibrate the continuity rule by market context.Expect greater economic-cycle sensitivity where cultures tolerate uncertainty less, and lower sensitivity where they favor longer horizons or accept hierarchy more readily; treat these as planning associations, not tested causes.
  3. Plan media resilience around cyclical exposure.Print budgets moved more with the economy than television, while radio moved least; reflect those differences in portfolio-level contingency planning.
  4. Make private-label defense part of continuity reviews.In packaged goods, advertising that rises and falls more sharply with the economy goes with faster private-label share growth; treat it as a risk signal, not a forecast.
  5. Frame continuity in shareholder-value terms.Among global advertisers, advertising that rises and falls more sharply with the economy goes with slower long-run stock-price growth; use the link in board risk discussions without claiming causation.
  6. Apply this to aggregate, country-level ad spending across traditional media.The evidence measures industry-level and macro effects, not individual-campaign performance or sales; confirm with campaign-level data before applying it to your own media plan.

Evidence

  • Across 118 country-media cases, 88% moved with the economy; 62% moved more sharply, averaging about 1.4% per 1% real gross domestic product (GDP) move.
  • Per 1% real GDP move, advertising averaged 1.70% for magazines, 1.54% for newspapers, 1.27% for television, and 0.79% for radio; radio was not reliably above a one-for-one move.
  • Advertising was less cycle-sensitive where cultures favored long-term goals or accepted hierarchy more readily, and more sensitive where cultures tolerated uncertainty less; collectivism had no reliable relationship.
  • At economic-cycle sensitivity 2.5 versus 1, annual advertising-industry growth was about 1.6 percentage points lower, against about 6% average growth.
  • In packaged goods, sensitivity 2.5 versus 1 corresponded to about 4.3 percentage points more private-label share growth over 25 years; the evidence is marginal.
  • Among 26 global advertisers, sensitivity 0 corresponded to about 1.3 percentage points more annual stock-price growth than 2.5; a marginal, small-sample association.

Key takeaway

Advertising budgets usually amplify the economic cycle; CMOs should govern continuity before downturn pressure hits.

Source

Deleersnyder, B., Dekimpe, M. G., Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2009). The Role of National Culture in Advertising's Sensitivity to Business Cycles: An Investigation across Continents. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(5), 623-636. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.5.623.

Evidence strength: Strong (annual advertising and GDP series across 37 countries and four media, 1980-2004; 118 country-media estimates; observational associations, not causal experiments). Traditional media only (magazines, newspapers, radio, television), excluding digital and outdoor; the study does not measure advertising's effect on brand equity. The private-label link (packaged goods) and the stock-price link (26 global advertisers) rest on small samples and clear only a marginal confidence standard, so treat both as directional.