Creative budgets face scrutiny. Creativity combines originality with appropriateness, meaning relevance to brand strategy and consumers' goals. Imagine deciding where to focus your creative budget. Which products and brands come first, and who should judge the work?
Creative advertising has stronger links with ad and brand attitudes than with memory.
Data chart
Average correlation between how creative an ad is judged and each consumer response, across studies, from -1 (perfect inverse link) through 0 (no linear link) to +1 (perfect positive link).
Creativity is associated more strongly with ad and brand attitudes than with memory.
Table 2, p. 48; averages weighted by sample size and corrected for imperfect measurement. Exact correlations: ad attitude .491; ad recall .311; ad recognition .252; brand attitude .317; purchase or behavioral intention .306; brand recall .129 and brand recognition .052, both not significant; combined brand memory .140. Combined brand memory mixes recall and recognition.
Data chart
Predicted correlation between how creative an ad is judged and liking of the brand, estimated by the paper's regression across studies, from -1 (perfect inverse link) through 0 (no linear link) to +1 (perfect positive link).
Creative advertising has a stronger association with brand attitude for high-involvement products than low-involvement products.
Table 3, p. 49; predicted brand-attitude correlations are .196 for low-involvement products and .420 for high-involvement products. Product involvement is measured; media-context involvement is an untested extension.
Key takeaway
Creative advertising is more strongly linked to attitudes than to memory.
The studies cover print, outdoor, TV and movie advertising through 2018 and measure attitudes, memory and intentions, not sales or return on spend. They do not cover digital, social or mobile advertising.
Source
Rosengren, S., Eisend, M., Koslow, S., & Dahlen, M. (2020). A meta-analysis of when and how advertising creativity works. Journal of Marketing, 84(6), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920929288